Treasury Secretary Bessent Slams Crypto Nihilists Blocking U.S. Market Structure Bill
Blog Agent Posted On February 6, 2026 Treasury Secretary Bessent Slams Crypto Blocking U.S. Market Structure Bill
In a heated Senate hearing, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent took a strong stand against parts of the crypto industry. He called out what he sees as crypto
What Sparked the Clash Over Crypto Regulation?
The drama unfolded during a Senate Banking Committee hearing. Bessent testified on the need for better rules in crypto. He said, “There seems to be a nihilist group in the industry who prefers no regulation over this very good regulation.”
Senator Warner, a top Democrat working on the bill, jumped in with, “Amen, brother. So weigh in.” Bessent replied, “I do. Early and often.” This exchange showed frustration from both sides of the aisle.
The bill in question is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. It seeks to define how crypto fits into U.S. financial rules. Topics include decentralized finance (DeFi), stablecoin rewards, and whether tokens count as securities.
Why Are Crypto Leaders Pushing Back?
Not everyone in crypto cheers this bill. Leaders like Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong have voiced concerns. Armstrong pulled support last month. He worries about how the bill handles DeFi rules, stablecoin yields, and token classifications.
Industry voices fear the rules could stifle innovation. They want freedom for blockchain tech to grow without heavy government hands. But lawmakers see risks like money laundering and national security threats.
- DeFi Gaps: Warner stressed fixing holes in DeFi oversight.
- Stablecoin Yields: Debates rage over rewards on these dollar-pegged tokens.
- Securities Definition: Clear lines needed to avoid SEC crackdowns.
Senator Warner’s Frustration: ‘Crypto Hell’
Warner shared his exhaustion. “I feel like I’m in crypto hell,” he said, drawing laughs. “We are working our tail off.”
He noted a key meeting is coming soon. Bessent may join. Warner leads talks on crypto’s illicit finance risks. His focus: national security and DeFi.
“We’ll deal with yields and rewards; we’ll deal with a host of other issues; but these national security issues around DeFi are real, and we need to not create a set of rules that leaves huge exemptions and, candidly, takes away some of the prosecutorial powers that exist today.”
Warner believes technical fixes are doable. But big issues like DeFi exemptions must be solved.
Bessent’s Bold Push for the Clarity Act
Bessent didn’t name critics but made his point clear. He said the industry can’t grow in the U.S. without this bill. “It’s impossible to proceed without it,” he stated. “We have to get this Clarity Act across the finish line. And any market participants who don’t want it should move to El Salvador.”
El Salvador is famous for adopting Bitcoin as legal tender with light rules. Bessent’s jab highlights the choice: rules in the U.S. or freedom elsewhere.
He praised the earlier GENIUS Act for stablecoin issuers. It balanced oversight with innovation. Bessent hopes the Clarity Act follows suit. “There seem to be people who want to live in the US, but not have rules for this important industry,” he added. “We’ve got to bring safe, sound and smart practices and the oversight of the U.S. government, but also allow for the freedom that is crypto.”
Optimism lingers. Bessent believes both parties can pass it this year.
Bipartisan Hopes from Senator Alsobrooks
Democratic Senator Angela Alsobrooks worked on stablecoin yield compromises. She feels good about progress. “I feel really good that we’re going to get a bipartisan compromise that protects innovation and our community banks,” she said.
Her words signal potential unity. Crypto lobbyists and banks have clashed, but talks continue.
Global Angles: China, CBDCs, and U.S. Stablecoins
The hearing touched world issues. Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, who leads the crypto subcommittee, asked about China. Is Beijing building a digital asset rival to U.S. leadership?
Bessent said, “We don’t know that for sure. There are lots of rumors of Chinese digital assets that may be backed by something other than the RMB, perhaps gold base.” He wouldn’t be surprised if China competes.
On central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), like those in China and Europe, Bessent prefers U.S.-regulated private stablecoins. They offer better options for users worldwide, he argued.
What Does This Mean for Crypto’s Future?
This bill could shape crypto in America. Clear rules might attract big money and talent. Without them, firms may flee to friendlier spots.
Pros of the Clarity Act:
- Legitimacy: Ends regulatory gray areas.
- Safety: Cuts illicit finance risks.
- Growth: Balances innovation with oversight.
Cons from critics:
- Overreach: Too many rules could kill DeFi.
- Unfair: Favors banks over pure crypto plays.
- Uncertainty: Changes could hurt token values.
Watch for the next meeting. Bipartisan deals on stablecoins and DeFi could push it forward.
Why Crypto Needs Rules Now
Crypto has boomed, but scandals like FTX show risks. Users lost billions. Regulators want to protect without smothering growth.
The U.S. leads finance. Strong crypto rules keep that edge over rivals like China. Private stablecoins beat government CBDCs for freedom and speed.
As Bessent puts it, smart oversight unlocks crypto’s potential. The fight against
Stay Ahead on Crypto Regulation
Track these developments. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act could pass soon. It impacts traders, builders, and investors alike.
What do you think? Will crypto leaders back down, or dig in? Share in comments.
Updated with latest hearing insights.
Discuss this news on our Telegram Community. Subscribe to us on Google news and do follow us on Twitter @Blockmanity
Did you like the news you just read? Please leave a feedback to help us serve you better
Disclaimer: Blockmanity is a news portal and does not provide any financial advice. Blockmanity's role is to inform the cryptocurrency and blockchain community about what's going on in this space. Please do your own due diligence before making any investment. Blockmanity won't be responsible for any loss of funds.
