The Hidden Flaws in Web3 Audits: Why They Fail and How to Make Them Work

Introduction: Audits That Don’t Deliver

Smart contract audits are a big deal in crypto. Projects spend thousands on them. They flash audit badges on websites to build trust. Investors check for them before buying tokens. But here’s the truth: even top-audited protocols get hacked. Balancer, a veteran DeFi player with multiple audits, suffered a major exploit. Yearn Finance, another audited giant, faced the same fate. Euler Finance added a feature after an audit – and that feature got hacked. USPD got audited before launch, but the deployment process wasn’t, leading to a total loss in months.

No one smart thinks audits guarantee safety. Many wonder if they’re worth the hype. This isn’t new or unique to Web3. Software audits everywhere have limits. But in crypto, where billions are at stake, the gap between audit promises and real security is huge.

In this post, we’ll dive into recent audits. We’ll see how they’ve shifted from finding real bugs to listing vague risks like quantum threats or ‘code quality needs work.’ We’ll explore why this happens and share practical fixes that benefit everyone – projects, auditors, investors, and exchanges.

How Web3 Audits Evolved (And Lost Their Edge)

Early audits were gold. They caught sloppy code – reentrancy bugs, integer overflows, access control fails. Programmers fixed them fast. Auditors shone as bug hunters.

But devs got better. Tools like Slither and Mythril caught basics early. Now, audits find fewer code bugs. To fill reports, auditors add generic warnings:

• Quantum computing could break signatures someday.
• Smart contracts are risky by nature.
• Code could be cleaner.

These aren’t wrong, but they’re useless. Real dangers hide: bad economics, centralization, stablecoin depegs. Code works as designed – then implodes.

Auditors follow project scopes. Projects set limits. If a stablecoin design is flawed, auditors note it. Team says ‘acknowledged.’ Nothing changes. Audits aren’t insurance. They’re snapshots.

Real-World Audit Examples: The Good, Bad, and Pointless

Let’s look at recent cases. These aren’t picks to bash – just snapshots of the state.

Case 1: The Big Firm L2 Project

A well-funded Layer 2 from a tech giant listed 8 issues. Only one mattered: docs claimed trustless, but multisigs made it semi-trusted. Fair call.

The rest? Quantum risks. General smart contract dangers. Code quality notes. These pad the report. For fun, add: ‘Sun explodes in 5B years, network dies.’ More relevant than fluff.

Case 2: Perps Platform with Narrow Scope

A high-speed trading platform audited a bridge contract. Six issues fixed later. But scope excluded core logic, oracles, incentives.

One report screamed CENTRALIZATION RISK FOR TRUSTED ENTITIES. Team acknowledged. Another flagged excessive minting if USDC depegs. Fix? Oracle check and pause button. Halts losses – doesn’t prevent them. Unfixable without redesign.

Auditing one tiny piece? Low value. Bridge safe doesn’t mean system safe.

Case 3: From Bug Fest to Single Vague Note

Older audit (2022): ~200 issues. Most fixed. Real bugs.

Now? One issue: unclear token distribution risks centralization. Mitigation: blog post promising future multisig dispersals. Still manual, flexible. Honest, but trust-based.

Purpose? Marketing checkbox. Clean code? Say so. No stigma in ‘all good.’

The Core Problem: Code Bugs Aren’t the Big Threat

Auditors excel at code flaws. Devs do too now. Fixes happen.

True killers: designs that work – then fail spectacularly. Stablecoins depeg. Incentives misalign. Leverage cascades. Audits note these as ‘out of scope’ or ‘informational.’

By 2024, everyone sees: economic bugs > code bugs. Projects explode as intended. Audits evolved to cover asses, not users.

Practical Fixes: Self-Serving Wins for All

No altruism needed. Smart moves that pay off.

For Projects: Be Honest Like Ethena

Ethena listed USDe risks upfront: basis trades fail, funding flips. No ‘risk-free’ hype. Survived bumps, grew huge. Honesty attracts real users, cuts legal risk. Investors: demand this.

For Auditors: Separate Real Risks

Don’t mix quantum fluff with reentrancy bugs. Sections:

• Code Issues: Critical, high, low bugs.
• Design/Econ Risks: Stablecoin fragility, incentives.
• General Warnings: Quantum, etc.

Clearer reports = better rep. Joint auditor statements: ‘Clean audits are good.’ No padding stigma.

For Exchanges: Demand Quality

Stop listing junk. Require audits covering econ stability. Value ‘clean’ reports. Honest exchanges win loyal traders over moon-boy hype. Perps era needs this – hidden leverage risks cascades.

For Investors/DeFi Users

Read beyond badges. Check scopes, acknowledgments. Favor honest projects. Decentralization moves risk – doesn’t erase leverage laws.

The Future: Innovate or Perish

Audits caught real issues early. Devs improved. Now auditors must: formal verification, econ modeling, stress tests.

Ecosystem shifts to synthetics, AI, perps. New risks. Better audits fit.

Web3 audits can reclaim value. Separate code from design. Reward honesty. Then, fewer ‘audited but hacked’ headlines.

Conclusion

The world is broken but fixable. Stop fluff. Face real risks: econ flaws, centralization, black swans. Projects, auditors, exchanges – act in self-interest. Crypto wins.

Stay vigilant. True security blends code rigor, design smarts, transparency.

Discuss this news on our Telegram Community. Subscribe to us on Google news and do follow us on Twitter @Blockmanity

Did you like the news you just read? Please leave a feedback to help us serve you better

Disclaimer: Blockmanity is a news portal and does not provide any financial advice. Blockmanity's role is to inform the cryptocurrency and blockchain community about what's going on in this space. Please do your own due diligence before making any investment. Blockmanity won't be responsible for any loss of funds.